1.
At the Beginning – Far from Having a Product ,
Companies Saw a Need to Build Reputation
Everyone has an image, but building reputation takes careful
planning, hence the need to hire someone on the outside, looking in and
orchestrating a road-map – from the sessions with critical stakeholders, the
interviews on Radio and TV, the Press Release to the Social Report – everything
must tell a story aligned to the desired end state. But beyond that, Companies focused on keeping the quality of their products or service high as a basis for continued patronage and good reputation.
The marriage was fluid and pleasant until quality became a buzz word and clutter slipped into
the media environment on the back of the worldwide web.
2.
From the Era of the Media is "Us" to the Era of
the Media is "Me"
After centuries of brandishing quality as a differentiator and latching on to the traditional media for
corporate story-telling, a big bang occurs and the world is thrown open. Now
every company must come to the table with quality and people are able to communicate with anyone in the world graphically and visually in
real time about their experiences of competing companies offerings. And as this changes kicked-in, things came tumbling out of control.
With the changes brought clutter and confusion, and as things progressed, the question on the mouth of future-oriented companies became - from the email, to the blog, the podcast and now with social
media - how do we build the needed differentiator for our offerings? How do we tell the corporate story to the right audience and be sure
they are listening and in turn helping to shape the desired perception? Suddenly, the name of the game changes from having a consumer
who is content with shopping for the same products under different labels to a
consumer who is not only individualistic and informed but one who seeks to be involved
in the production or service process.
3.
Under the New Era – How Do We Tell the Corporate
Story?
Under this era of individualism with the consumer drawing expression and association with all that he encounters, based on the connection he feels with each product or service, rather than the perceived quality of the product or service, telling the corporate story becomes a complex game. In building communication that connects, the demand on business therefore became to understand not just what the consumer wants but how the consumer wants it.
So away from onground reality, shaping perception also became complex. And in trying to simplify things, the print journalist jumps in, wielding data on the
circulation figures as well as the demographics of the readers, claiming “it
can never be better than knowing precisely where your crowd has been for
decades and knowing it really does not change”. Excuse me? Never changing demographics
or never changing consumption patterns? Does that really exist?
Still trying to make things easier, the broadcaster comes knocking, claiming “the crowd is still
with me and I know because there is a TV and a radio in most homes”. Hey, whatever
happens to the proliferation of electronic media? How does this affect
gathering the crowd?
Still seeking Eldorado, the Social Networker and Citizen journalist breaks in saying, “I am the new deal,
try me for size and you’ll see the beauty of your story come through with
immediacy of feedback”. Looks good and Interesting,
but how about unintended consequences?
In an attempt at finding an Eldorado, everything changes
as everyone stakes a claim to the crowd and what the crowd wants remain elusive.
What is even sadder still, is the fact that the Public Relations professional whose duty is to seek out what the crowd wants is considered a middleman and
in today’s business logic, everything must be done to get rid of the middleman because he not only reduces
turn-around time and increases cost, he also prevents personalization and customization. The take is, why do I need a Public Relations
professional? “I know what my desired reputation is and I figured I can hire a
guy who speaks the PR language and I can deal directly with the media – whether
old or new – on my own!
And as changes continue to happen in both the social and
business environment, new challenges erupt raising new questions and demanding
specialist knowledge. But guess what? The business buff finds a way around it. “I
reckon I can talk to each platform directly and just maybe, my crowd will pick
it up and run with it”. But in telling the story, he fails to recognise that
each platform places a demand. And in telling the same story, there is a need
to vary it based on the nuances of each platform. He then hits a brick-wall.
And still in search of the Eldorado, he keeps trying the same things and hoping
for a different result.
4.
The New Game is About Building a Community of
Followers.
In today’s complex business and media environment, the only way to avoid
clutter is to build a community of followers who share your values and are ready
to openly associate with you.
The Social Media teaches a good lesson in building
communities as communities once built, become a centre for telling a corporate
story and having members tell their experience. And as the storytelling becomes
a two-way game, the true picture about how a business is perceived emerges and
keeps emerging as new things happen in the external environment.
Truth is, in building a community and ensuring continuous
participation, Public Relations regains relevance but in regaining
relevance, new skills are demanded of the Public Relations practitioner. He
remains an arbiter but no longer a middleman. The Public Relations professional
must become as immersed in the story as the owner of the story and must
participate in the feedback process as ardently as the average member of the
community. But even as the new skills are honed and owned, the search for
Eldorado continues, because the world is ever changing.
5.
Building a Corporate Stature – Its More About
Dynamism than Heritage
And away from the Public Relations professional, businesses
must strive to be different with every encounter in the storytelling process. But
beyond finding a difference, the intrinsic value of the business must have a
dynamic basis as this deepens the experience; because a story is just as good as
the experience of the product and service in the moment of truth. And given that today’s consumer is intensely curious,
easily bored and always searching for something new, legacy and heritage cannot
stay static, it must have a dynamic basis with the value it brings remaining
ever new to the consumer.
Once upon a time, Microsoft ruled in personal computing and
Nokia reigned in the world of mobile device. The story changed as the divide between
both became blurred and in came the almighty Apple which became ubiquitous as
it built a closed community of ardent and fanatical followers.
But that soon changed as Android soon busted the bubble and
Samsung became the new word for sexy and smart. But the story is indeed a labyrinth
with no end but only layers and
pit-stops, so the way to find your place under the sun, is to keep changing to
meet the needs of thirsty consumers with fleeting loyalty.
No comments:
Post a Comment